Petitioner affirmed no personal interest. Court ordered disposal, leaving petitioner free to file a Public Interest Litigation, expressly reserving merits.
Petitioner allowed to file a PIL; petition disposed without examination of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
POOJA MAHAJAN
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Arun Maitri and Ms Radhika Chandrashekhar and Ms Ananya Roy, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Mr Srivats Kaushal, Advocate for R-1 and R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 07.01.2019
CM No. 232/2019
W.P.(C) 49/2019 & CM No. 231/2019
merits of the controversy raised in this petition and nothing stated in this order shall be construed as such. The pending application is also disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 07, 2019 MK
Pooja Mahajan
Union of India and ors.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
