The High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal had already decided the matter, rendering the question of pre-deposit moot.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous without answering questions of law or passing order as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
AIREF ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prashant Shukla, Advocate
versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 08.02.2018
Counsel for the appellant states that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has decided the appeal filed by the appellant vide order dated 29th November, 2017.
In view of the aforesaid position, the present appeal relating to question of pre-deposit becomes infructuous.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed as infructuous without answering the questions of law, without any order as to cost.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2018 pk
AREF ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.
THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal in a service tax matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
