The appeals were disposed of following the satisfaction of a decree via encashment of fixed deposits. The cross-appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The appellant was allowed a refund of court fees.
The appellant's appeals were disposed of; the cross-appeal was dismissed as withdrawn; the appellant was entitled to a refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:18.10.2024 16:47:39 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
01.06.2005 till the date of deposit. Secondly, direction to pay cost of counterclaim is modified. Cost is made easy. Parties would bear their own cost.
I
The appeals are disposed of, in the above terms.
■//
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2018/b
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Techno Info Pvt. Ltd.
Lord Krishna Bank Limited
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
