The judge disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the first respondent accepted the petitioner's request. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
versus
INDIAN CERTIFICATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. J. K. Das, Sr. Adv. with Sandeep D. Das and Ms. Mahek Khurana Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pradeep Morula and Ms. Urmila Verma, Advs. for R-2 Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Adv. for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 08.02.2018
Counsel for the respondents has handed over a copy of the order dated 07.02.2018, written by the Chief Executive and Secretary of respondent No.1. In view of the peculiar facts, the respondent No.1 has accepted the request made by the petitioner.
In view of the said position, the writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
We appreciate the efforts of counsel for the first respondent
who resolved and settled the controversy.
We clarify that the court has not expressed any opinion on merits.
CM No. 34890/2017 is also disposed of as infructuous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
FEBRUARY 08, 2018 b
Ananya Srivastava
Indian Certificate of Secondary Education
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
