Atika Gaur v. Satish Chand & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
An appellate court dismissed an appeal in default as the appellant was unrepresented, noting that the impugned order was executed with the amount already withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~R-6
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- EX.F.A. 8/2009
ATIKA GAUR ..... Appellant Through: None.
versus
SATISH CHAND & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Salil Paul, & Mr. Sahil Paul, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
- % 10.12.2018
A submission had already been made on behalf of the appellant on 30.11.2018 that the amount in terms of impugned order dated 25.09.2008 of the learned Additional District Judge in Execution 220/08 has already been withdrawn.
None being present on behalf of the appellant, the appeal is dismissed in default.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Atika Gaur
- respondent
Satish Chand
Coram
Anu Malhotra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court