Disposed
Era Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. &Anr v. Employee State Insurance Corporation
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./6218/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
ERA INFRA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. & ANR...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kapil Sankhla, Ms. Apporva Kumar and Mr. Rishabh Dua, Advs.
versus
EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Singh, Ms. Nisha Hans and Ms. Prachi Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK O R D E R % 06.12.2018
During the course of hearing, the learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that present petition is being pressed only for cancellation of NBWs issued against the petitioner no.2.
Learned senior counsel submits that petitioner no.2 will appear before the trial court on 7th February, 2019. Learned senior counsel further submits that on 16.07.2015 officials of respondent had visited the premises of petitioners and they were provided records pertaining to the period April, 2010 to March, 2015. Reliance has been placed on the visit note dated 16.07.2015 (Annexure P-13). He further subms that demand of `24,14,140/was raised pursuant to the said inspection which was even paid on 12.01.2016 through a demand draft. Reliance has been placed on the
statement of account of petitioner maintained with the Corporation Bank, Sector 18, NOIDA, UP at page 131.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the above facts have to be verified from the respondent.
Since petitioner no.2 has undertaken to appear before the trial court on the date fixed, without going into the merits and demerits of the contentions of the petitioners, I am of the view that present petition, which is only for quashing of non-bailable warrants, can be disposed. Accordingly, impugned order, whereby NBWs have been issued, is set aside. Petitioner no.2 shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.
Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
DECEMBER 06, 2018 ga
ERA INFRA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. & ANR
EMPLOYEE STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court