Allowed

Rinku Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC22 Mar 2018W.P.(CRL)/861/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed under Article 226 CrPC to quash FIR 225/2016 (498A/406/34 IPC) regarding matrimonial dispute. Court found dispute settled amicably with payment of ₹1,35,000 and dissolution of marriage, holding no useful purpose served by continuing proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.225/2016 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Vikas Puri and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

Rinku Kumar & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~36

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 861/2018

¶4

RINKU KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr.Nand Kishor with Mr.M.Hasibuddin, Advocates along with petitioners present in person.

¶5

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms.Jyoti Babbar, counsel for Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC. Mr.R.K.Verma, Advocate for R-2 along with complainant/R-2 present in person. SI Rajender, PS Rajouri Garden.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 22.03.2018

¶9

Crl.M.A.No.5363/2018 (Exemption)

¶10

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 861/2018

¶13

Present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.225/2016 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Vikas Puri. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2 before Delhi W.P.(CRL) 861/2018 Page 1 of 2

¶14

Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

¶15

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present with counsel and has been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant if she has settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. She has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with her free consent and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question. Marriage between the parties has been dissolved. Pursuant to the settlement, remaining amount of ` 1,35,000/- by way of demand draft bearing No.598921 dated 13.03.2018 drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce in the name of the complainant has been given her today in the Court.

¶16

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Settlement/Compromise deed dated 20.03.2017 signed by the parties before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts is on record.Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to settle in life after dissolution of marriage, FIR No.225/2016 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Vikas Puri, Delhi and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶17

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶18

S.P.GARG, J.

¶19

MARCH 22, 2018/ sa

¶20

W.P.(CRL) 861/2018

¶21

Page 2 of 2

Rinku Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muslim Vs State

Dharambir Vs the Statr of NCT of Delhi

Baker Street through Its Director Rohit Agarwal Vs Sdmc & Ors.

Virender Saxena & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Ramesh Vs State

Yashpal @ Mukesh @ Chattoo Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Rohit Sehrawat Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Hitachi Payment Services (P) Ltd. Vs NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Dharambir Vs the Statr of NCT of Delhi

Baker Street through Its Director Rohit Agarwal Vs Sdmc & Ors.

Dharambir Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Vs State & Ors.

Kavita Durgapal Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Vijay Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi