Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
BAKER STREET THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ROHIT AGARWAL
..... Petitioner
Through : Ms.Nanita Sharma with Mr.N.Shekhar and Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocates.
versus
SDMC & ORS
..... Respondents
Through : Ms.Pooja Kalra, Advocate, for R-1. Mr.Digvijay Rai, Advocate, for R-2 and 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
O R D E R
%
21.03.2018
S.P.GARG, J.
MARCH 21, 2018/ sa
BAKER STREET THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ROHIT AGARWAL
SDMC
S.P.GARG
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
