Ramesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi granted three weeks parole to the petitioner, convicted under Section 376 IPC, for a period of release. The court imposed a personal bond and required surrender after the parole period. Previous appeal was dismissed and admission of guilt was conceded.
What did the court decide?
Parole granted for three weeks on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, to surrender after period.
What the court decided
$~41
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 894/2018 RAMESH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sumit Verma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC. W/ASI S.Devi, PS North Rohini. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 23.03.2018
- The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report not filed.
- Nominal Roll dated 12.03.2018 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `10,000/-. Crl.A.495/2013 was dismissed by this Court on 03.11.2017. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone six years and eight months incarceration besides remission for one year, three months and twenty-seven days as on 06.03.2018. It further reveals that he is not involved in any other criminal case and is not a previous convict. His overall jail conduct is satisfactory. He has not availed any interim bail or parole during his detention.
Page 1 of 2
- In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be granted bail/parole on account of ill-health and for the safety of witnesses?
Whether the petitioner has fulfilled the bond requirements?
Whether the petitioner shall be released on bail or not?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMESH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
S.P. GARG
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court