Writ petition disposed of. Court noted petitioner's ex-wife stated she left him of her own accord and does not wish to return. No further directions issued.
No further directions issued. Petitioner advised to avail other legal remedies if available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHIV SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Advocate.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R
% 05.04.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
APRIL 05, 2018 ‘dc’
SHIV SINGH
STATE NCT OF DELHI
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
