Petitioner sought parole to attend a compulsory personal contact programme for his university studies. Court granted two-week parole subject to personal bond and surety.
Petitioner granted parole for two weeks subject to furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000/- with one surety of like amount, subject to Superintendent's satisfaction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29# $~
| * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DE |
LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|
| + W.P.(CRL) 587/2018 |
|
| SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Avnish Sharma and Mr. Amod Singh, Advocates. |
| THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF D Represented by: |
ELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State and Ms. Purnima Malik, Advocate for State/respondent No.1 with SI Manish Yadav, PS Vasant Kunj, North. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P. for CBI and Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 06.04.2018
Crl. M.A. No. 5973/2018 (Early hearing)
Issue notice.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for State and learned Spl. PP for CBI accept notice.
By this application the petitioner seeks early hearing of the main petition for the reason the next personal contact programme which the petitioner would be entitled to attend is fixed from 20th April, 2018.
For the reasons stated in the application, hearing of the writ petition is preponed to today.
W.P.(CRL) 587/2018
Page 1 of 3
Application is disposed of.
Date of 24th April, 2018 in the writ petition is cancelled.
W.P.(CRL) 587/2018
parole for a period of two weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹25,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Tihar Jail. 5. Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. APRIL 06, 2018/‘vn’
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 587/2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted parole to appear for his university examination.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for parole considering his prior concessions and the lack of misuse allegations.
SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
