Sati @ Shabana & Anr. v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners seeking protection under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to apprehension from respondents (relatives). Respondents objected to no interference in matrimonial affairs. Court granted continuation of protection order and restrained respondents from interference.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of protection order dated 31.01.2018; respondents restrained from interfering in matrimonial affairs.