Mohd Gulshan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order where the High Court dismissed two criminal appeals for default of appearance as appellants were unreachable, cancelled their bail bonds, and directed police to inform the court upon recapture.
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed; bail bonds and surety bonds cancelled; appellant signatures directions.
What the court decided
$~R-37 & 38
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.A.917/2002
MOHD. GULSHAN ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State
- CRL.A.988/2002
SHABOO @ SANJU ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
O R D E R % 05.04.2018
- The Station House Officer (‘SHO’) who is present in the Court has instructed the learned APP for State that neither of the Appellants are found on the addresses given and they have not given any fresh address at which they can be contacted.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MOHD. GULSHAN
- appellant
SHABOO @ SANJU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court