The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition citing discrepancies in a complaint and charge-sheet, proposing arguments on conditions of release for the petitioner at the Trial Court.
Petitioner's petition withdrawn; request for expeditious hearing of arguments on conditions of release at Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
ORDER
%
07.08.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are serious discrepancies in the original complaint filed by R-2. The Charge-sheet has now been filed. He submits that there is manipulation with regards the petitioner's income, which initially was stated by the petitioner to be Rs.53,OOGA, subsequently it was made Rs. 1 lac per month. He also refers to other documents about stridhan which according to him have similar manipulation.
Mr.Sanjay Lao, the learned counsel for the State submits that since the Charge-sheet has now been filed, the petitioner has statutory remedy available to him and he may make similar arguments before the Trial Court concerned; he submits that the petition is pre-mature.
In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same with a request that the Trial Court may be requested to expedite hearing of arguments on Charge.
The learned counsel for the . State submits that the State too is interested in an expeditious trial and would make similar request to the Trial Court when the matter is listed.
The petition is disposed off in the above terms.
It will be always open to the parties to settle the lis by way of mediation.
AUGUST 07, 2018/acm
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
