Ravi Sharma v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, considering the petitioner's continuous custody of over six years and his prior non-misuse of a parole concession, granted parole for four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on parole for four weeks upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000/- with a surety bond of the like amount subject to Jail Superintendent's satisfaction.
What the court decided
$~58
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2325/2018
| RAVI SHARMA | ..... Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Represented by: | Mr. Sumeet Verma with Ms. | |
| Preeti Jakhar, Advocates. |
| versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| STATE | Represented by: | ..... Respondent Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Manvendra, |
| PS Karawal Nagar. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 06.08.2018
- Notice.
- Learned proxy counsel for learned Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice.
- Status report has been handed over which is taken on record. As per the status report the family of the petitioner comprising of his mother and brother were found residing in H. No. C-146, Gali No. 8, Prem Vihar, Karawal Nagar, Delhi.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, convicted of murder and illegal possession of arms and in continuous custody for over six years, is entitled to parole.
What are the conditions and duration of the parole to be granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravi Sharma
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court