Petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 484 CrPC due to inordinate delay. State submitted charge-sheet filed, making petition infructuous. Petitioner withdrew petition with liberty to pursue other remedies.
Petitioner granted permission to withdraw petition with liberty to pursue other remedies under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
This petition seeks quashing of FIR No.35/2011 dated 11.02.2011 under sections 420/448/465/467/471/120B IPC, Police Station – Badarpur on the ground that there has been inordinate delay in conclusion of the investigation.
The learned counsel for the State submits that Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore the petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition at this stage and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to pursue his remedies as may be available in law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 07, 2018/acm
HARIKANT TRIPATHI
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
