Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to pursue other legal remedies. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petitioner granted liberty to pursue other legal remedies; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
versus
THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State alongwith Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Advocate with W/SI Meenakshi, PS-Jagatpuri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue his remedies, as may be available in law.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 08, 2018
RW
FARHEEN KHAN
THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
