Sunil Bhargava v. CBI
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought clarification on an earlier order regarding defreezing of joint bank accounts but chose to withdraw the application with liberty to approach the court again.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take legal remedies in respect of joint accounts.
What the court decided
$~3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1304/2017
| SUNIL BHAR | GAVA Represented by: |
... Petitioner Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| versus | ||
| CBI | ... Respondent | |
| Represented by: | Mr.Nikhil Goel with Mr.Ashutosh Ghade, |
|
| Mr.Gurpreet Hora, Advocates and Mr.Ashok Kumar, I.O. |
||
| CORAM: |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 01.05.2018
Crl.M.A.7199/2018
By this application the petitioner seeks clarification of the order dated 13th March, 2018 for de-freezing of six more accounts which were in the joint names of the petitioner and his wife with the Punjab National Bank, Mid Corporate Branch, Connaught Place, New Delhi as the Punjab National Bank wrongly interpreted the order of this court dated 13th March, 2018.
The petitioner before this Court was Sunil Bhargava and this Court vide order dated 13th March, 2018 directed defreezing of the individual accounts of the petitioner vis-a-vis the amount so deposited with M/s.Rank Mercantile Pvt. Ltd as in the FIR it was alleged that Archana Bhargava, the wife of the petitioner extended favour to the parties which was reciprocated W.P.(CRL) 1304/2017 Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can seek clarification regarding joint accounts after the court directed defreezing of individual accounts
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Bhargava
- respondent
CBI
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court