The Court issued a writ of habeas corpus directing the police to produce the petitioner's missing husband and update her on inquiries. The order was allowed subject to exceptions given pending prior domestic proceedings.
Direct State to inform petitioner every four weeks of steps taken to inquire into husband's whereabouts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
MEENU ANITA CHOHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Pranesh Misra, Advocate.
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for the State with Insp. Satish Chandra, S.I. Davindera, P.S. Badar Pur.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R % 12.03.2018
Crl.M.A.No.4584/2018(exemptions)
W.P.(Crl.) No.743/2018
W.P.(Crl.) No.743/2018
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(Crl.) No.743/2018
Page 2 of 3
Petitioner informed, once every four weeks, of the steps taken to inquire into the complaint.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
MARCH 12, 2018 ‘anb’
W.P.(Crl.) No.743/2018
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the petitioner's husband who has gone missing.
Whether the State should be directed to regularly inform the petitioner about steps taken to inquire into his whereabouts.
MEENU ANITA CHOHAN
STATE
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
