State v. Mumtaz & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court admitted this criminal appeal, listed it for hearing alongside a pending appeal, and granted interim bail to the accused upon furnishing personal bonds with two sureties.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was admitted and the accused were admitted to bail upon furnishing personal bonds with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each.
What the court decided
$~4.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.L.P. 586/2017
STATE
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP along with Inspector Subhash Chand, PSBawana, for the State.
versus
MUMTAZ & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anupam S Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
%
O R D E R 12.03.2018
We have heard learned counsel for the State as well as the respondents. We are of the view that the impugned judgment needs deeper examination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
STATE
- respondent
MUMTAZ & ORS
Coram
VIPIN SANGHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court