Petitioners, major adults who married freely, sought to withdraw a habeas corpus petition alleging forced marriage. Respondents consented to withdrawal with disclaimer to future complaints. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47# $~
| THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & OR | S. ..... Respondents |
|---|---|
| Represented by: | Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, |
| Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Amit, PS |
|
| Ambedkar Nagar. | |
| Mr. Mukesh Singh and Ms. | |
| Lucky Tiwari, Advocates for | |
| respondent Nos. 3 to 5 with | |
| respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in | |
| person. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.04.2018
Though no steps have been taken for service of respondent Nos. 3 to 6 respondent Nos. 3 to 6 are present in Court along with their counsel.
The petitioners who are present in Court state that they are major and have married of their own free will contrary to the wishes of respondent Nos. 3 to 6.
The fact that the petitioners are major has been verified by the State and is also confirmed by respondent No. 3, father of petitioner No.2.
Though respondent Nos. 3 to 6 have not reconciled with the marriage of the petitioners however, they state that they will not interfere in the happy W.P.(CRL) 628/2018 Page 1 of 2
married life of the petitioners.
In view of the statement of respondent Nos. 3 to 6, petitioners who are present in Court and identified by the learned counsel and the investigating officer, seek leave to withdraw the present petition as nothing further survives in the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is however, clarified that in case any complaint is received from the petitioners SHO, PS Ambedkar Nagar will take action in accordance with law.
Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
APRIL 09, 2018 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 628/2018
Himanshu @ Mannu & Anr.
The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
