Dismissed
Deepak Mahajan v. Satya Prakash
Delhi HCCRL.L.P./104/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or deposit the previously imposed court costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~22
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.L.P. 104/2017 DEEPAK MAHAJAN ..... Petitioner Represented by: None
¶4
versus
¶5
SATYA PRAKASH ..... Respondent Represented by: None
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶7
O R D E R % 09.04.2018
¶8
Despite passover, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. While adjourning the matter on the last date, this Court imposed cost. No receipt of the cost was deposited.
¶9
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶10
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
¶11
APRIL 09, 2018 mamta
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
DEEPAK MAHAJAN
- respondent
SATYA PRAKASH
Coram
AI extract
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court