Abhinav v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for anticipatory bail under Section 376 IPC, the court observed the FIR details regarding a relationship that soured before marriage. The petitioner was granted exemption (bail) subject to undertakings regarding investigation contact and furnishing a personal bond.
What did the court decide?
Exemption from arrest allowed subject to undertaking to join investigation and not approach complainant, with a bond of Rs. 20,000 plus surety.
What the court decided
$~1
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 2583/2017 ABHINAV
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv with Mr. Pankaj Kapoor, Adv.
| versus |
|---|
| STATE | Through | Mr.Kewal | ..... Respondent Singh Ahuja, APP for |
|---|---|---|---|
| State. | |||
| WSI Saroj 23. |
Bala, PS Dwarka Sector- |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 09.01.2018
Crl.M.A.No.20751/2017 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case under Section 376 IPC where parties had consent under misconception.
Whether the undertaking given by the petitioner suffices for grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abhinav Singh Ahuja
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court