Hdfc Bank Limited v. Sushil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition challenged an order dismissing a section 138 complaint for non-prosecution. The lower court held that the complainant's authorized representative failed to appear or lead evidence for four consecutive dates over a year. The High Court found no reason to interfere and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Leave to impugn the order dated 04.06.2018 is denied; the petition is dismissed.