Writ petition setting aside the direction to conduct investigation under Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. Court directed Trial Court to decide summons issue based on existing evidence.
Direction to Trial Court to decide summons issue based on evidence led by petitioner without further inquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29# $~
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashish Negi, Advocate for Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Amar Singh, PS Saket.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.03.2018
the complaint filed by him, the learned Trial Court be directed to decide the issue of summons to the accused based on the evidence led by the petitioner till date and no further inquiry be conducted.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 09, 2018 ‘vn’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 511/2018
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the direction to conduct investigation under Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. should be set aside when the petitioner has led sufficient documentary evidence.
Whether the Trial Court should decide the summons issue based on evidence already led by the petitioner without further inquiry.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJIV KAPUR
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
