Sajid @ Shambhu v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This court granted three weeks parole to a petitioner convicted for life imprisonment under Sections 302/307/34 IPC. The petitioner was required to furnish a bond and improve conduct.
What did the court decide?
Three weeks parole granted subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety and surrender after the period.
What the court decided
$~18
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 58/2018
SAJID @ SHAMBHU ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Ankur Sood, Advocate with Mr.Uday Bedi & Mr.Romila Mandal, Advocate.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through : Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC. SI Lalit Chauhan, PS Timarpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 08.03.2018
- The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record. Learned ASC informs that the address of the petitioner has been verified. She, however, informs that the conduct of the petitioner is not good and he has been given various punishments. 2. Nominal Roll dated 21.12.2017 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/307/34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for life imprisonment with total fine `4,000/-. Crl.A.163/2009 was dismissed by this Court on 13.11.2009. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone fourteen
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant parole to the petitioner convicted for life imprisonment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajid @ Shambhu
- respondent
State
Coram
S.P. Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court