Dismissed
Rakesh Kumar Sachdeva v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/424/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26# $~
| * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DE |
LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|
| + W.P.(CRL) 424/2018 |
|
| RAKESH KUMAR SACHDEVA Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Pandey, Mr. Manmohan, Advocates with petitioner in person. |
| THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF D Represented by: |
ELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Inspector Afzar Raza, EOW. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC for UOI/Respondent No.2. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 09.03.2018
By this petition the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to investigate upon the representation/complaint of the petitioner dated 16th May, 2017 and any other order that this Court may deem fit.
Petitioner made a complaint alleging fraud by Om Prakash Sawariya, his wife Durgi @ Mamta, brother Vinod Sawariya, brother in law Saty Narayan @ Satya Narain and his wife Sunita for causing wrongful loss to the complainant after inducing him for delivery of goods of ₹4,34,05,598/-.
Learned proxy counsel for the learned Additional Standing Counsel W.P.(CRL) 424/2018 page 1 of 2
for the State submits that on 7th March, 2018 FIR No. 37/2018 has been registered under Sections 409/420/120B IPC.
Learned proxy counsel for the State on instructions for the Investigating Officer, submits that during the investigation if any other offence is found to be made out or any other victim is found to be involved, the same will also be associated with the FIR in question and a charge sheet will filed after the completion of the investigation, if offences are found to be made out.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for the State on record, petition is disposed of.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. MARCH 09, 2018 ‘vn’
page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 424/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should issue to direct the respondents to investigate the petitioner's complaint alleging fraud.
Rakesh Kumar Sachdeva
State Govt of NCT of Delhi / Erushas (UOI)
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court