The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition regarding a missing girl traced in Bihar. The court permitted her to accompany her parents back to Delhi, leaving the investigation into alleged abduction open for police conclusion.
Permitted the missing girl to accompany her parents and leave with them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1.
RAJENDER SAHU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.), GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate and Inspector Rajesh Sharma and ASI Rakesh, PS: Jafrabad alongwith the missing girl, Ms. Shikha.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 05.12.2018
Committee (CWC) on the very same day and CWC directed that she be lodged at Sanskar Ashram, Dilshad Garden, Delhi. On 28.11.2018, the statement of Shikha was recorded by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi under Section 164 Cr.PC wherein she stated that her parents were pressurizing her for marriage against her wishes, due to which she left home and arrived at Darbhanga where stayed with her friend, Annu. The statement of the missing girl is enclosed with the Status Report and marked as Annexure-A. On 29.11.2018, she was again produced before the CWC but since her parents did not turn up, she was directed to be housed at Sanskar Ashram.
Page 2 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 3470/2018
DASTI to the Standing Counsel (Crl.), GNCTD under the signatures of the Court Master.
HIMA KOHLI, J
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
DECEMBER 05, 2018 rkb/na
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 3470/2018
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajender Sahu
State & Ors
Hima Kohli
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
