The bench granted leave to withdraw petitions seeking pre-emptive constitutional challenges. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed as pre-mature and disposed of. All pending applications were also disposed of.
Leave granted to withdraw petitions; petitions dismissed as pre-mature and disposed of; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
nrincivle of law that the constitutionality of a statute can be raised only by a person aggrieved by it. ne petitioner has not been able to demonstrate so. Thus any petition seeking a pre-emptive declaration or interpretation would not be mQintciincibls- cit this stcigc y
to urge that, in view thereof, he seeks ieave to withdraw these petitions, at this stage as being pre-mature.
Leave granted.
The petitions are dismissed as being pre-mature and are disposed of
L,''
accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDH^RTH mridul, j
A D GRA SEHGAL, J
DECEMBER 04, 2018
RS
<#
W.PfCRL) Nos. 1444/2018 & 1445/2018 v
page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to withdraw pre-mature petitions challenging constitutionality of a statute.
Unknown Petitioner
Respondent
Siddharth Mridul
A.D.R. Ganguly
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
