The court disposed of W.P.(CRL) 1276/2018 as infructuous noting a closure report was filed. The connected M.A. No.48783/2018 was allowed subject to exceptions.
Liberty to raise objections to closure report and file a protest petition subject to all just exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
VIJAY SARAN & ORS ... Petitioners
Represented by: Mr.R.S.Chauhan with Mr.Hemant Chauhan and Mr.Mohit Yadav, Advocates
versus
STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI) & ORS ... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with Inspector Anil Kumar, PS EOW
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 04.12.2018
Crl.M.A.No.48783/2018 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 1276/2018
Learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that a closure report has been filed before the Competent Court on 20th July, 2018 in case FIR No.696/2015 under Sections 420/34 IPC registered at PS Rajinder Nagar, Delhi.
Since a closure report has already been filed, the petitioner would be at liberty to raise objections thereto and file a protest petition. No further orders are called for in the instant petition.
W.P.(CRL) 1276/2018
Page 1 of 2
Petition is disposed of.
Crl.M.A.No.48782/2018
Dismissed as infructuous.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
DECEMBER 04, 2018 ‘rk’
W.P.(CRL) 1276/2018
Page 2 of 2
VIJAY SARAN & ORS
STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI) & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
