Petitioners withdrew the Not Pressed Writ Petition over the initiation of criminal proceedings. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Liberty granted to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
RAJ KUMAR JAIN & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Chirag Gupta, proxy counsel for Mr. Hari Kishan, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with SI Badlu Ram, PS Janak Puri.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 04.12.2018
Ms. Rao, the learned APP for the State submits that the chargesheet has since been filed, the petitioner may pursue his remedy as may be available in law.
In the circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being not pressed. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
DECEMBER 04, 2018 /kk
RAJ KUMAR JAIN & ANR
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
