Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition if an occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mehta and Mr. Prithvi Garg, Advs.
Versus
STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)& ORS
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with ASI Surender, P.s. Keshav Puram.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 11.09.2018
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the case is next listed before the Trial Court tomorrow, he does not wish to press the petition and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh petition at appropriate stage, should an occasion for the same arise.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 acm
Artha Hospitality & Lifestyles
State (NCT of Delhi)
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
