Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge on 10.09.2018 without recording substantive arguments or applying any legal provisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
KANAK @ SHIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vimal Puggal, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with SI Sunil, PS-Subhash Palace.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition. It is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2018
RW
Kanak @ Shiv Kumar & Ors
The State & Ors
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
