This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
ANIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Ms. Shilpa G. Mittal and Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advocates.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with SI Vikram Singh, PS-Lahori Gate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 10.09.2018
The petitioner’s SLP was dismissed on 23.03.2018. He seeks parole for filing a curative petition and to arrange funds for the same. It is his last and final chance to seek acquittal or other remedies, as may be available to him in law. His conduct in jail is stated to have been satisfactory. He was earlier released on parole for filing an SLP and he has not misused the liberty granted.
In view of the above, the Court finds no impediment in allowing the present petition. Consequently, the petitioner is granted parole for a period of six weeks, from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent concerned subject to the following conditions:-
With the above directions the Writ Petition is disposed-off.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2018
RW
ANIL KUMAR
STATE NCT OF DELHI
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
