Ahmed Nafis v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi granted parole to the petitioner for four weeks to file a Special Leave Petition and admit his children in school, subject to a personal bond and satisfactory conduct.
What did the court decide?
Parole granted for a period of four weeks upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹15,000/- with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Superintendent.
What the court decided
33# $~
| * IN THE HIGH |
COURT OF DE | LHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|
| + W.P.(CRL) 1398/ |
2018 | |
| AHMED NAFIS | Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Kumar and Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocates. |
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| CORAM: | Represented by: | Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State with SI Rohit Kumar, PS Jamia Nagar. |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 10.09.2018
- By this petition, petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition and get his children admitted in school.
- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the interregnum the Special Leave Petition has been filed by the petitioner and tagged along with the Special Leave Petitions filed by the co-convicts. He however, seeks parole to re-establish social ties and to take care of the children.
- As per the nominal roll the conduct of the petitioner in Jail is satisfactory. The petitioner has undergone more than six years of imprisonment including the remissions. Petitioner was granted interim suspension of sentence by this Court during the pendency of the appeal which concession the petitioner did not misuse. Besides the petitioner, four persons have been convicted in FIR No.23/2009 under Sections 302/34 IPC W.P.(CRL) 1398/2018 Page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible to be released on parole to seek Supreme Court leave and admit his children to school.
Whether the conditions attached to the grant of parole are appropriate in the given facts.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AHMED NAFIS
- respondent
STATE
Coram
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court