Dismissed
Vijay @ Shunty v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/2551/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
VIJAY @ SHUNTY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate.
Versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R. S. Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Ms. Suman Saharam, Advocate and SI Jaibir Singh, P.S. Geeta Colony.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 05.12.2018
The petitioner seeks parole to attend to his mother, who is stated to be indisposed. The factum of her illness has been verified; she is 58 years old and is supported by another adult son of hers, who is living with her.
In the circumstances, no case is made out for grant of parole. The petition, alongwith pending applications, stand dismissed.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
DECEMBER 05, 2018 sb
VIJAY @ SHUNTY
STATE
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court