In CRL.M.A. No. 30479/2018, the Court allowed an exemption. In the connected W.P.(CRL) 2491/2018, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies.
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions in Cross Application No. 30479/2018; Writ Petition 2491/2018 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 2491/2018
SH. BRIJ RAJ SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rama Shankar, Advocate with Mr.Saurabh & Ms.Seema Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain & Mr.Tushar Sannu, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 23.08.2018
CRL.M.A.No.30479/2018 (Exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 2491/2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
AUGUST 23, 2018 tr
Sh. Brij Raj Singh
State & Ors.
S. Muralidhar
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
