Dismissed
Raju v. the State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/334/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50# $~
versus
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Usha Rani, PS Bindapur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 21.08.2018
Despite pass-over none appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State states that a closure report has been presented in FIR No. 861/2015 under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC registered at PS Bindapur, Delhi, which appears to be the reason for non-appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 21, 2018 ‘vn’
Raju & Ors
The State & Anr
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court