The High Court held that a writ petition challenging detention became infructuous and disposed of the petition after the Advisory Board declined to confirm the detention order.
Disposal of the writ petition and pending application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
PREET KUKMAR AGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Raktim Gogoi, Mr.Harshit Sethi, Mr.Kartikeya Singh, Mr.R.P.Saini and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Sr.Standing Counsel. for DRI.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 21.08.2018
In view of the order passed by the Advisory Board declining to confirm the detention order qua the Petitioner, this petition has become infructuous. The petition and the pending application stand disposed of as such.
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
VINOD GOEL, J.
AUGUST 21, 2018/ sa
Preet Kukmar Agarwal
Union of India and Others
S. Muralidhar
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
