The single judge granted leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file for quashing of the FIR upon settlement between parties.
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw with liberty to file for quashing; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28# $~
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Bhoopendra Kumar, EOW. Mr. Faheem Shah, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 03.08.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a petition seeking quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of compromise as parties have settled the matter and the complainant has been given a flat in lieu of the money which was to be given by the petitioners.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 03, 2018 ‘vn’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file for quashing the FIR on grounds of compromise.
S.K. Chopra & Ors.
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
