This order condones a nearly one-month delay in depositing court fees (₹15,000) for the Prime Minister Relief Fund. No substantive issues were heard.
Delay in depositing court fee condoned; pertinent receipt taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
Represented by: Mr. Anurag Jain and Ms. Ayushi Sharma, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 12.09.2018
Matter is listed on an office note for the reason the proof of the cost directed to be deposited vide order dated 7th May, 2018 has not been deposited. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over the photocopy of the receipt which shows that the cost of ₹15,000/- to be deposited in the Prime Minister Relief Fund has already been deposited on 27th June, 2018. The photocopy of the receipt is taken on record.
The delay of nearly one month in depositing the cost is condoned. No further orders are required to be passed.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 ‘yo’
FARHAN SABIR
THE STATE & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
