THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
Leave and liberty granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1# $~
| WAKAR ALI | Represented by: versus |
..... Petitioner Mr. Mrityunjay K. Singh and Mr. Gyandenra Mishra, Advocates. |
|---|---|---|
| STATE OF DEL | HI & ORS. Represented by: |
..... Respondent Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Shankun Devi, PS Subhash Place. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 08.05.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take remedies as available in law.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MAY 08, 2018 ‘vn’
Wakar Ali
State of Delhi
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
