Allowed

Shriniwas & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Apr 2018W.P.(CRL)/1019/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows exemption in CRL.M.A. No. 6360/2018 and grants a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The High Court of Delhi quashed the FIR following an amicable settlement and compromise deed executed between the parties.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 502/2017 and all proceedings arising therefrom are quashed; petitioners directed to deposit ₹20,000 in Prime Minister Relief Fund.

Shriniwas & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1019/2018

¶4

SHRINIWAS & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through : Mr.Vikas Yadav, Advocate with Ms.Upma Yadav, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC with ASI Manu Ram, PS Dwarka. R2 is present in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R % 10.04.2018

¶7

CRL.M.A.No. 6360/2018 (Exemption)

¶8

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

The application stands disposed of.

¶10

W.P.(CRL) 1019/2018

¶11

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 502/2017 registered under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC at PS Dwarka South. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the complainant / respondent No.2 vide compromise deed dated 21.02.2018. Learned ASC informs that there are four accused persons i.e. petitioners. He further informs that there is only one victim i.e. complainant / respondent No.2.

¶12

Complainant / respondent No.2 is present in person and has

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from the complainant if he has settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. He has informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with his free consent and he has no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶15

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of compromise deed dated 21.02.2018 has been placed on record. Cross case registered vide FIR No.511/2017 registered under Sections 325/506/509/341 IPC at PS Dwarka South has also been settled and the FIR therein has been quashed. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No. 502/2017 registered under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC at PS Dwarka South and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶16

The petitioners are directed to deposit ` 20,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶17

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶18

S.P.GARG, J

¶19

APRIL 10, 2018 / tr

¶20

Page 2 of 2

Shriniwas & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shriniwas & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Chander Sharma Vs the State(Nct of Dlehi ) & Ors.

Mehmood Topiwala Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Himanshu @ Mannu & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Deepali Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rohit @ Rohit Bhuttan & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kailash Shankar & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Aarti Nishad @ Aarti Balkrishana & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Jyoti Ahirwar & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Virender Saxena & Anr. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Rohan @ Charan & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Raju Vs State

Sneha Sawai Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

Ramya S.R. Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Farhan Sabir & Anr. Vs the State & Ors.