Kamlesh Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed a W.P.(CRL) for grant of parole for a period of four weeks on furnishing a personal bond with one surety, considering the petitioner's family presence in Delhi and no prior misuse of parole. Disposed of matter on 05.12.2018.
What did the court decide?
Released on parole for four weeks on personal bond of ₹10,000/- with one surety.
What the court decided
39# $~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1916/2018
KAMLESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Ms. Preeti Jakhar and Mr. Satyam Sharma, Advocates.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate with SI Ranjit Singh, PS Roop Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 05.12.2018
By this petition, petitioner seeks parole to maintain social ties.
A status report has been filed. As per the status report, brother of the petitioner along with his family is residing at 10/18, Shakti Nagar, Delhi. As per the nominal roll, petitioner has been granted parole for a period of four weeks in the year 2016 and 2017 and there is no allegation that he misused the said concession.
Considering that the petitioner’s brother along with his family is residing in Delhi and also the nominal roll, this Court deems it fit to grant parole to the petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety in the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Tihar Jail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole to maintain social ties with his family residing in Delhi.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kamlesh Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court