Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sushil Vs State — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2018)

Home
Delhi HC
2018
Sushil Vs StateSushil v. State

Dismissed

Sushil v. State

Delhi HC10 Jul 2018BAIL APPLN./770/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner Shushil's anticipatory bail petition was dismissed as infructuous because he was already arrested by the date of filing.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's arrest.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

$~18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- BAIL APPLN. 770/2018, Crl.M.A. 7937/2018

SUSHIL

..... Petitioner

Through: None.

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through: Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Anita, P.S. Baba Hari Das Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
SUSHIL
respondent
STATE

Coram

AI extract

NAJMI WAZIRI

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 10 Jul 2018 · July
Registered: 9 Apr 2018
Case no.: BAIL APPLN./770/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Najmi Waziri

Anuradha Chowdhry Vs State & Anr.
9 Jul 2018
Shumayla @ Suhani Singh Sengar & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
9 Jul 2018Writ Petition (Criminal)
Mohd Sonu @ Mosam Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi
9 Jul 2018
Hardeep Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
10 Jul 2018

Cite this judgement

Sushil v. State, BAIL APPLN./770/2018 (DEL), decided on 10 July 2018.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

NAJMI WAZIRI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's arrest.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail petition dismissed as having become infructuous due to the petitioner's subsequent arrest before filing or during hearing proceedings.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

% 10.07.2018

None appears for the petitioner. Mr. Tarang Srivastava submits that the petitioner has since been arrested on 01.05.2018, therefore, this petition seeking anticipatory bail has become infructuous.

The petition is dismissed has having become infructuous.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J

JULY 10, 2018 /acm

CNR

DLHC011030482018

Topic

Anticipatory Bail

Bench

Writ Petition (Criminal)

Ashok Singh @ Ashok Singh Khunga Vs State & Ors.

10 Jul 2018Writ Petition (Criminal)

Shyam Ji Nigam Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi)

10 Jul 2018Writ Petition (Criminal)