Bharti Sahu & Ors. v. the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajit Kumar proxy counsel for petitioner.
versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Rahul, P.S. Shakar Pur.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 23.08.2018
Mr. Sanjay Lao, the learned ASC for the State submits that although the FIR was registered in 2013, a crucial element of investigation was held up because the wife of the deceased was absconding. She was apprehended earlier this year and the investigation has since proceeded expeditiously; the Charge-sheet is now ready and is likely to be filed within a fortnight. He submits that the petitioner was arrested but was released as the Charge-sheet was not filed within 60 days of her arrest.
The petition is disposed off in the above terms.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 23, 2018/acm
Bharti Sahu
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court