Dismissed
Raju v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/826/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
$~11
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(CRL) 826/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.5192/2018 RAJU
¶4
- ..... Petitioner
¶5
- Through Mr. Zeeshan Hashmi, Adv.
¶6
versus
¶7
STATE
¶8
..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr. Siddharth Sindhu, Adv for the State.
¶9
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
¶10
O R D E R
¶11
% 20.03.2018
¶12
The petitioner is seeking furlough for the reasons mentioned in the petition. His application seeking furlough had been declined by the Competent Authority. This was for the reason that he did not have a good conduct; he had in fact jumped the furlough which had been granted to him earlier.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
RAJU
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
INDERMEET KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court