This order dismisses a writ petition filed by Amit Yadav in default due to the respondent's failure to respond, noting that his representation regarding the South Delhi Municipal Corporation had been rejected.
Petition dismissed in default of appearance by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
AMIT YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Nemo. Versus
J L GUPTA THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ... Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 04.12.2018
Vide order of 7th May, 2018, respondent- South Delhi Municipal Corporation was directed to decide petitioner’s Representation.
Counsel for respondent informs that petitioner’s Representation has been rejected on 18th July, 2018. Perhaps for this reason, there is appearance on behalf of petitioner.
This petition is accordingly dismissed in default.
SUNIL GAUR, J
DECEMBER 04, 2018
r
Amit Yadav
J L Gupta
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
