This order disposed of a writ petition deemed infructuous after the petitioner's counsel so submitted. No substantive legal proposition is recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CPWD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Harishankar Sharma, Advocate
versus
SHASHI SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Jain, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 04.12.2018
Petitioner’s counsel submits that this petition has become infructuous.
In view of aforesaid, this petition and the application are accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
DECEMBER 04, 2018
v
The Director General CPWD
Shashi Sharma
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
