Disposed
The Director General Cpwd v. Urmila Devi
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1606/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CPWD ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Amrtia Prakash, CGSC.
versus URMILA DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Jain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
%
O R D E R 16.01.2019
CM APPL 54005/2018 (for modification)
By way of this application, modification of order of 4th December, 2018 is sought to incorporate the reason as to why the petition has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for applicant/petitioner submits that this petition had become infructuous, in view of the Circular of Director General dated 29th September, 2016 and an affidavit has been filed to the effect that the computation of the gratuity etc. has been made and dispersed.
While taking on record the aforesaid factual position on record, the application is disposed of.
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 16, 2019
p’ma
The Director General CPWD
Urmila Devi
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court